top of page

Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories....(Band 9 Essay)

Updated: Sep 25

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.


Write about the following topic:


Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories, and their employees to the countryside.

Do you agree or disagree?


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.


You should write at least 250 words.


Task 2 Band 9 Essay Sample (Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories, and their employees to the countryside.)

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 1

A proposition has been put forth suggesting that the predicaments of traffic and housing shortages could be ameliorated through the relocation of significant corporate entities, manufacturing plants, and their respective workforce to rural territories. I strongly concur with this notion, as it promises to alleviate the congestion of urban centres, stemming from the reduced number of commuters on the roads, and an augmented inventory of residential accommodations.


To commence, routing employees to rural areas would alleviate traffic congestion by curtailing the number of daily commuters using various modes of transportation. The concentration of a significant workforce within city limits serves as a principal factor leading to traffic congestion. Therefore, directing employees to countryside locales would relieve the metropolis of this problem. For instance, London experiences peak-hour traffic during morning and evening rush hours, primarily due to employees commuting to and from their workplaces. Moreover, relocating to the countryside would provide city migrants with a chance to improve their quality of life by enjoying spacious living quarters and fresh air, a luxury that is often unattainable for city dwellers.


When it comes to housing, the issue of availability is often exacerbated by the high demand for rental properties, which is largely driven by the employees of significant corporations and manufacturing facilities. When these employees are relocated to rural areas, the demand for housing in urban centres decreases, resulting in a surplus of available flats. Thus, as more companies and their workforce are encouraged to relocate to the countryside, it can alleviate the housing crisis in cities by creating more housing opportunities for those in need. Milan, a city in Italy, serves as an example of how relocating companies and their employees to rural areas can mitigate housing shortages in urban centres. Milan encouraged companies to relocate their operations to the rural parts of the region, thereby freeing up more housing for residents in need.


To conclude, transferring businesses and their workforce out of the city is a plausible strategy to mitigate traffic and housing challenges, as it would decentralize industrial operations and distribute the burden between the city and countryside.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 2

Many believe that relocating large companies and factories to rural areas could alleviate traffic and housing problems in cities. I strongly agree with this view because such a move would significantly reduce urban traffic congestion by decreasing the number of commuters and delivery vehicles, and alleviate housing demand by shifting population growth to less crowded areas.


Firstly, moving major businesses to the countryside would dramatically reduce the number of vehicles in urban areas. Large companies, which often employ thousands of workers, contribute heavily to rush hour traffic as employees commute daily. By relocating these businesses, fewer people would need to drive into the city, thus easing road congestion. For instance, a company with 2,000 employees could mean 1,500 fewer cars on city streets, substantially reducing traffic. Additionally, transport trucks used for deliveries and shipments add to traffic slowdowns and road wear. By moving these activities to rural areas, not only would city roads face less wear and tear, but transport delays would also be minimized, leading to a more efficient flow of traffic. This reduction in traffic could have long-term benefits, including less air pollution and fewer road accidents.


Secondly, relocating businesses to rural regions would alleviate the housing shortage in cities. High employment opportunities in urban areas often lead to a surge in housing demand, driving up property prices and reducing the availability of affordable housing. By moving companies and their workers to the countryside, urban demand for housing would decline, resulting in lower property prices and more space for city dwellers. Furthermore, this shift would encourage rural development, offering more balanced population distribution and reducing the strain on urban resources. Cities would no longer need constant construction to accommodate growing populations, which could also improve residents' quality of life by preserving open spaces and reducing noise pollution from construction.


In conclusion, relocating large companies to rural areas would not only reduce the volume of daily commuters and transport vehicles, easing traffic congestion, but also lower the demand for housing in cities, leading to more balanced urban development.


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score



Sample Essay 3

The notion that traffic and housing issues could be significantly alleviated by relocating large enterprises, their manufacturing counterparts, and personnel to rural locales has garnered attention. This essay posits that while this approach holds merit in addressing urban congestion and accommodation crises, it also entails nuanced considerations. The ensuing discussion will delve into the potential benefits and accompanying challenges of such a strategy.


Central to the argument for decentralization is the alleviation of urban strain. Moving large companies to the countryside promises to reduce vehicular congestion and demand for housing in metropolitan areas, thereby mitigating two of the most pressing urban dilemmas. For instance, a company's relocation can lead to a more even distribution of population and economic activity, which, in turn, diminishes the intensity of urban traffic and lowers housing demand, potentially stabilizing real estate prices. Moreover, this dispersal of economic opportunities could stimulate rural development, reducing the urban-rural divide and promoting more balanced regional growth.


However, the implementation of this proposal is not devoid of hurdles. The infrastructure in many rural areas may be insufficient to support large businesses and their employees, necessitating significant investment in transport, utilities, and housing. Additionally, the transition could disrupt the lives of employees, many of whom may be unwilling or unable to relocate due to personal ties or the allure of urban amenities. Hence, while the idea of moving large companies to the countryside is appealing for its potential to solve traffic and housing problems, it requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the logistical and human elements involved.


In conclusion, the proposition that relocating large companies and their workforces to rural areas can address traffic and housing challenges presents a compelling, albeit complex, solution. It offers a pathway to more sustainable urban living and the revitalization of rural communities. However, the success of such a move hinges on careful planning and the commitment to overcoming the substantial logistical and socio-economic barriers that accompany it.



Sample Essay 4

Resolving traffic and housing issues by relocating large companies and their employees to rural areas presents a promising but complex solution. This essay argues that while such a move could alleviate urban congestion, it may also introduce new challenges. The key points of discussion will be the potential benefits for urban centres and the possible implications for rural communities.


Firstly, moving large corporations to the countryside could significantly reduce urban traffic congestion and housing shortages. Major cities across the globe are plagued by chronic traffic jams and soaring housing prices, largely attributed to high population densities and a concentrated clustering of employment opportunities in urban centres. Decentralizing these employment hubs would not only reduce commuting times and vehicular emissions but also lower urban living costs as demand for city housing decreases. For instance, a study by the Urban Planning Institute of America suggests that cities with decentralized employment zones experience 30% less traffic during peak hours compared to those with centralized job locations. This decentralization can also stimulate economic growth in surrounding suburban areas, further balancing regional development.


However, the transition of large companies to rural areas presents its own set of challenges. The infrastructure in many rural areas is often not equipped to handle the sudden influx of businesses and new residents, potentially leading to overstrained public services and a degradation of the quality of rural life. Furthermore, such a move could inadvertently create socio-economic disparities, where rural areas may become overly dependent on these companies for economic stability. The case of Smalltown, USA, exemplifies this; when two tech companies relocated there in 2015, they initially boosted the local economy. However, this influx later led to housing shortages and increased living costs that mirrored the urban challenges, thus shifting rather than solving the core issues. This example highlights the need for careful planning and investment in rural infrastructure to ensure sustainable development.


In conclusion, relocating corporations to the countryside could alleviate urban congestion and housing issues, as demonstrated by decreased city traffic and lowered living expenses. However, this shift poses risks of overburdening rural infrastructure and creating economic imbalances.



Sample Essay 5

In recent days traffic jam and less available accommodation facilities have become two of the major issues that city dwellers often experience. However, I completely agree that these could easily be addressed if companies were able to move their factories and employees to the village rather than in cities.


Regarding problems related to traffic, relocating corporate offices away from cities can provide even distribution of vehicles in that area. This can be seen in the way that if larger brands such as Tesco and others moved their offices from the heart of city centers, employees travelling to their offices would not need to use these roads during rush hours. This, in turn, leads to less congestion in that zone as they would travel through village roads. Hence, being stuck in a traffic jam would almost never be a problem encountered by those who work there as well as the residents.


Turning to housing issues, it is almost certain that employees tend to live in places closed to their workplaces. Only when corporate offices shift their spaces to the outskirt of cities, will workers feel motivated to have an accommodation around that area. Though some people may enjoy city vibes and love to commute, however, there numbers are not that significant. This, as a result, would lessen the burden of housing crisis in cities; an example can be seen in countries like Sweden and Germany. Therefore, the more factories are moved to the countryside, the better the housing facilities will be available.


To conclude, not only does the traffic congestion reduce, but the squeeze on available accommodation also reduces when relocation of larger corporations is possible to areas far from cities and towns. It is high time we should consider having adequate measures for that necessary step.



Sample Essay 6

Most large companies are found in the city which may lead to traffic and housing issues. Some think that these problems can be solved by having them relocate to the outskirts of town. I agree with this statement because there would be less transport as well as less construction zones in the city.


To begin, big companies tend to have many employees who need to find a way to get to work everyday. If there are 1000 workers who need to get to their jobs in the morning that could mean up to 1000 extra cars on the road causing more traffic in a condensed area. In addition to employee commuting, large companies also increase the volume of delivery trucks and transport vehicles in the city, which further disrupts traffic flow. Since the business transports, dedicated to carry tons of goods at a time, are big vehicles; moving slow on the roads and disrupting the flow of traffic in the city. Moreover, this causes cars to occupy residential roads which disrupt neighbourhoods as well.


Additionally, with a high traffic volume in the city, there is more damage done to the roads from all the cars and transports passing through. As a result of continuous heavy traffic, cities face constant road maintenance, leading to frequent road closures and further disruptions for residents Construction companies must go in and repave large sections of the highways and some residential areas. This causes slowdowns in traffic and disruptions in neighbourhoods. By relocating companies to rural areas, the strain on urban infrastructure would be significantly reduced, resulting in fewer road repairs and improved traffic conditions in cities


In conclusion, traffic and housing issues could be solved if big companies moved to the outskirts of town since there would be less people commuting as well as a decrease in construction in high traffic and residential areas.



Sample Essay 7

Opinions are often divergent regarding whether large-scale companies should relocate their facilities and employees to rural areas to mitigate inner-city traffic and accommodation problems. Despite a reduction in the volume of traffic and housing demands in big cities, this would not be an optimal solution to tackle the issues.


Relocating large businesses to the outskirts derives a major benefit involving diminishing the number of city occupants required to migrate for work. The decline in the cities’ population often translates to a decrease in traffic during rush hours with fewer private vehicles used to commute to work. A shrink in the inner-city population might also ameliorate the dwelling demands in the city centres, relieving the pressure on the state housing supply systems.


The idea that relocating big companies and factories to the countryside would solve traffic and housing problems is flawed. While this solution might bring some benefits, such as creating job opportunities and boosting the rural economy, it fails to address the root causes of the urban housing and traffic issues. These problems stem from a combination of factors, including ineffective traffic laws, poor public awareness, and inadequate urban infrastructure. Similarly, housing scarcity in cities is driven by a desire for increased living space and amenities, not just the presence of large firms and factories. Therefore, moving large companies and factories to the countryside is unlikely to provide a comprehensive solution to the housing and traffic problems in urban areas.


In conclusion, the positives of businesses being relocated to the rural areas are affirmed; however, it is not the most effective approach to solve the difficulties concerning accommodation and traffic in the big cities.


Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner


Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score

bottom of page