There Should Only Be One Government in the World - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essays

Sample Essay 1

In an increasingly interconnected world, the idea of a single global government replacing national administrations is often seen as a path to unity and efficient governance. However, such centralization would come at a significant cost, potentially eroding cultural diversity and exacerbating power imbalances. For these reasons, I firmly believe the disadvantages far outweigh the potential benefits.

 A single global government could potentially enhance global collaboration by eliminating the barriers posed by competing national interests. Issues such as climate change, poverty, and international conflicts require cohesive strategies, which a unified government might implement more effectively. For example, a global authority could streamline environmental policies, ensuring universal adherence to climate agreements, or allocate resources to address global health crises without the delays caused by national bureaucracy. However, despite these benefits, such centralization is fraught with significant challenges, particularly in reconciling the vast cultural and political disparities between nations.

These challenges reveal why the drawbacks of a global government outweigh its potential advantages, particularly regarding the erosion of cultural diversity and disproportionate power dynamics. Each country’s unique cultural identity reflects its citizens' values and traditions, which a centralized authority would struggle to preserve. For instance, the rich traditions of countries like Brazil or Ethiopia may be marginalized under global governance prioritizing uniformity over diversity. Furthermore, global governance is prone to power imbalances, where dominant nations could exert undue influence, marginalizing smaller states. Organizations like the UN often showcase such tendencies, despite being multilateral institutions. Concentrating power globally risks authoritarianism, where checks and balances become increasingly difficult to enforce, leaving populations vulnerable to exploitation.

In conclusion, while a global government may offer theoretical benefits like unity and streamlined governance, the risks of eroding cultural diversity and exacerbating power imbalances are far more significant.

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!

Get our comprehensive IELTS Essay Correction Service from a real examiner!

Sample Essay 2

The idea of having a single global government instead of national governments is often proposed as a way to foster unity and tackle global challenges more efficiently. While such a system may offer certain advantages, this essay strongly argues that the disadvantages far outweigh the benefits. This position will be elaborated by analyzing the risks of cultural erasure and inefficiency in managing diverse populations under a single administration.

Centralized governance on a global scale poses a significant threat to cultural diversity and identity. Nations are deeply rooted in unique traditions, languages, and histories that form their citizens' sense of belonging. A single government could inadvertently prioritize dominant cultures while marginalizing others, leading to the erosion of minority identities. For example, smaller nations with distinct customs may find their voices drowned out in a system designed to cater to a global majority. This could create widespread discontent and fuel regional resistance, ultimately undermining the very unity a global government seeks to achieve. The preservation of cultural diversity requires localized governance that can prioritize and protect the values of individual communities.

Furthermore, managing the world’s population under a single government would likely be fraught with logistical inefficiencies and inequalities. The sheer scale of governing billions of people with vastly different needs, economic structures, and legal systems would lead to bureaucratic gridlock. For instance, what works for developed nations may not address the pressing issues of developing countries. A one-size-fits-all approach to governance risks neglecting local problems and exacerbating existing inequalities. This disconnect between centralized decisions and regional needs could lead to widespread dissatisfaction and political instability. National governments, in contrast, are better equipped to tailor policies to the unique demands of their populations.

In conclusion, while a global government might promise unity and cooperation, the potential for cultural erosion and governance inefficiencies makes such a system impractical and even harmful. Maintaining national governments is essential for preserving cultural diversity and addressing local issues effectively, ensuring that governance remains both equitable and efficient.

Sample Essay 3

It is said that this planet should have a sole government, instead of having one authority for each nation. I believe the drawbacks of one single government in the world outweigh the benefits because although a single government authority in the world could address global problems efficiently, it could also lead to greater social inequities on a global scale. 

The main benefit of a united global government is that it could resolve the primary problems that human beings face efficiently. This is because all resources are centralized and utilized to solve issues directly, without prolonged discussion and debates. For example, if the UN had more power to act as the only one authority in the entire world, global warming could be improved to a significant extent, and the legislation regulating each nation’s carbon emissions would be easier to comply with, as the resistance from major industrial countries like the United States and China would reduce. However, I would argue that a united world government could result in a more divided world due to an unbalanced resource distribution. 

One drawback of a single authority in the world is that resources would be distributed unfairly. That is to say that, nations that have more population and more power would be more likely to obtain more resources under this circumstance, and as a result, small countries’ needs would often be neglected. For instance, China, which has a powerful central government, is considered more focused on the needs of the majority and sacrificing the interest of the ethnic minorities. I think if there were only one government in the world, the minor countries’ needs would be also overlooked, resulting in global inequities. 

In conclusion, although a single global government could be beneficial to addressing major global problems, I believe this would lead to an inequitable world due to an unbalanced resource distribution. 

Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!