Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
In several nations, debates arise on whether substantial investments should fund high-speed railways connecting cities or enhance existing public transit systems. While new railways promise swift city-to-city travel, others argue that improving current public transport can yield more immediate, widespread benefits. This essay examines both perspectives and argues that upgrading existing public transportation infrastructure is the most effective use of funds.
Supporters of constructing high-speed railways argue that such projects can revolutionize intercity travel, offering faster, more efficient alternatives to cars and domestic flights. For example, Japan's Shinkansen and France’s TGV systems have demonstrated remarkable success, reducing travel times significantly and easing pressure on roads and airports. High-speed trains also present a greener solution by reducing carbon emissions, especially in comparison to air travel, which is essential in the fight against climate change. Advocates believe that investing in new railways can promote regional economic growth by making commuting between cities feasible, thus creating opportunities for people to work in larger urban centers without relocating. However, these projects demand extensive time and resources, often causing delays and cost overruns that risk the allocation of funds that could be used for immediate improvements in urban areas.
On the other hand, proponents of investing in current public transportation systems argue that this approach addresses pressing needs more effectively. Urban areas globally face severe congestion, pollution, and overcrowding issues in their public transit systems. Upgrading buses, trams, and metro lines can directly improve daily commuting experiences for millions. For instance, New York City’s subway overhaul project, which focused on modernizing signal systems and updating aging infrastructure, has resulted in reduced delays and enhanced service reliability, positively impacting daily commuters. Improving existing transit systems also has the advantage of benefiting people from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds by enhancing accessibility and affordability, which is especially important for those reliant on public transit for local travel. In addition, modernizing current transport systems often costs less and yields faster, more tangible results, making it a practical choice for densely populated urban centers.
In conclusion, while high-speed railways offer futuristic transport options, enhancing existing public transit provides more immediate, inclusive, and sustainable benefits. Focusing on upgrading current systems not only addresses urgent urban mobility needs but also ensures a more equitable distribution of transportation resources.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
In various countries, there is ongoing debate about whether large sums should be invested in constructing new high-speed railways between cities or in upgrading existing public transportation systems. While improving current public transit may provide some advantages, I believe that building new, efficient railway lines is a more forward-thinking solution to modern transportation needs. This essay will discuss both perspectives, ultimately supporting the view that prioritizing new railway projects is a more strategic use of funds.
Those advocating for improvements in existing public transport argue that this approach directly addresses the daily commuting needs of millions within urban areas. Existing systems in cities worldwide often suffer from aging infrastructure, frequent delays, and overcrowding, which hinders their efficiency and reliability. For instance, London’s underground and New York City’s subway system face constant complaints from commuters due to outdated tracks and congested services, causing significant inconvenience. Upgrading these systems could immediately enhance the quality of life for urban dwellers, promoting timely and accessible travel. Additionally, investing in existing transport is generally more affordable and avoids the high initial costs associated with large-scale railway construction. However, while this approach serves immediate needs, it often lacks the transformative impact needed to accommodate growing populations and expanding intercity travel demands.
In contrast, proponents of high-speed railway construction emphasize that these projects can fundamentally transform intercity travel, promoting economic growth and reducing environmental impact. High-speed railways, like those seen in China and Germany, provide a fast, efficient, and eco-friendly alternative to cars and short-haul flights, significantly lowering carbon emissions. By connecting major urban centers within hours, these systems facilitate business, tourism, and employment mobility, driving regional economic development. For example, China’s high-speed rail network has created unprecedented connectivity across cities, leading to job creation and economic integration. Furthermore, such infrastructure projects often stimulate related sectors, from construction to hospitality, benefiting local economies. Although costly, high-speed railway construction provides a long-term solution for efficient, sustainable transport, positioning cities to better meet the demands of future population growth and reducing dependence on less efficient modes of travel.
In conclusion, while upgrading current public transport systems offers some immediate benefits, prioritizing new high-speed railways presents a more sustainable, economically advantageous choice for the future. Investing in modern railway lines not only addresses the pressing need for faster, greener travel between cities but also fosters broader economic development and environmental sustainability.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 3
In many countries, a debate has emerged regarding the allocation of substantial funds to either construct high-speed railway lines between cities or enhance existing public transportation systems. Although enhancing current transit networks offers immediate benefits to urban populations, I believe that investing in new high-speed railways is a more progressive and transformative solution. This essay will discuss both perspectives, ultimately supporting the view that high-speed rail investments yield greater long-term advantages.
Some argue that improving existing public transport systems should take precedence, as this approach directly tackles the urgent problems facing city commuters. Urban transit systems worldwide are often strained, with issues such as overcrowding, delays, and safety concerns. For example, Mumbai’s local train network is infamous for its overcrowding and outdated facilities, which leads to daily struggles for millions of residents. Addressing these problems through modernization of trains, buses, and infrastructure would alleviate many of these inconveniences, providing a tangible boost to commuters’ quality of life. Moreover, public transit improvements are typically quicker to implement and have a broader reach, benefiting not only the workforce but also students and low-income residents who rely on affordable local transport. However, this approach often results in only incremental improvements that fail to address the larger need for a rapid, integrated transport solution capable of reducing the dependency on personal vehicles and relieving urban congestion at a fundamental level.
On the other hand, proponents of high-speed railway investments argue that these projects offer a more ambitious vision for the future, with potential to reshape intercity travel and regional connectivity. High-speed trains, such as those operating in South Korea and Italy, drastically reduce travel time between distant cities, encouraging economic integration and tourism across regions. This connectivity creates new opportunities for people to live in one city and work in another, which could relieve population pressures in overly crowded urban centers while boosting underdeveloped areas. Additionally, high-speed railways offer significant environmental benefits by replacing car and air travel with a cleaner alternative, thereby contributing to long-term sustainability goals. Although these projects are resource-intensive, they offer a holistic solution that addresses both immediate transportation needs and future environmental concerns, aligning with global sustainability agendas.
In conclusion, while enhancing existing public transport systems can offer immediate improvements for daily commuters, prioritizing high-speed railways provides a far-reaching solution that boosts connectivity, economic growth, and environmental sustainability. Investing in high-speed rail is a forward-thinking approach that serves both present and future transportation needs, making it the more impactful choice.
Get your personalized IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score