Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!
Sample Essay 1
The debate over banning smoking remains contentious, with some advocating for its prohibition to protect public health and others opposing such restrictions as an infringement on personal freedom. In my opinion, smoking should indeed be banned due to its detrimental effects on public health and the substantial economic burden it imposes. This essay will critically explore these reasons, highlighting the societal benefits of such a measure.
Smoking poses severe health risks, not only to smokers but also to non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke. The inhalation of tobacco products has been scientifically linked to numerous diseases, including lung cancer, heart disease, and chronic respiratory conditions. For instance, studies reveal that over eight million people die annually due to tobacco-related illnesses, and approximately 1.2 million of these deaths are attributed to passive smoking. Such statistics underscore the ethical responsibility to protect vulnerable groups, including children and pregnant women, from involuntary exposure. Furthermore, banning smoking in public spaces could significantly reduce these risks, fostering a healthier society. Beyond individual health, smoking-related illnesses strain healthcare systems, diverting resources from other pressing medical needs. Thus, a prohibition would serve both ethical and pragmatic purposes.
In addition to health concerns, smoking imposes a massive financial burden on economies. Governments spend billions annually on treating smoking-related illnesses, with public healthcare systems bearing the brunt of these costs. For example, the United States reportedly allocates over $170 billion each year to medical treatments related to tobacco use. Moreover, productivity losses due to smoking-related diseases and premature deaths further exacerbate economic inefficiencies. Critics may argue that banning smoking could harm tobacco-related industries and reduce tax revenues. However, this loss could be offset by savings in healthcare expenditure and investments in alternative industries, such as wellness and recreation. Ultimately, banning smoking would lead to long-term economic benefits, outweighing any short-term drawbacks.
In conclusion, smoking should be banned due to its significant health risks and economic costs. Prohibiting smoking not only safeguards public health but also alleviates the financial strain on governments. By taking decisive action, societies can promote healthier lifestyles and ensure sustainable economic growth.
Get our comprehensive IELTS Essay Correction Service from a real examiner!
Sample Essay 2
The proposition to ban smoking remains divisive, with strong arguments on both sides. While many argue for its prohibition due to health concerns, I firmly disagree with banning smoking. Such a policy undermines personal freedoms and risks economic repercussions. This essay will critically analyze why smoking should remain a choice, highlighting the importance of individual rights and the economic value of the tobacco industry.
Banning smoking infringes on personal liberties, a cornerstone of democratic societies. Adults should retain the autonomy to make choices about their own lives, even if these decisions carry risks. Smoking, like consuming alcohol or unhealthy foods, is a personal choice that individuals make fully aware of its consequences. Prohibiting it would set a dangerous precedent, empowering governments to interfere excessively in personal lifestyles. Furthermore, a complete ban may lead to unintended consequences, such as the creation of black markets, which are notoriously difficult to regulate and often associated with crime. For example, the prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s led to a surge in organized crime. Allowing smoking within reasonable limits ensures that society respects individual freedoms while mitigating the negative effects through education and regulation rather than outright bans.
The tobacco industry plays a significant role in many economies, generating substantial revenue and employment. From farmers cultivating tobacco crops to workers in manufacturing and retail, millions depend on this sector for their livelihoods. According to the World Bank, tobacco taxes contribute billions to government revenues annually, funding public services like education and healthcare. Eliminating smoking would create economic disruptions, particularly in developing countries heavily reliant on tobacco exports. Critics may argue that the health costs of smoking outweigh these benefits, but taxation can be leveraged to offset healthcare expenses without resorting to prohibition. Additionally, industries like tourism and hospitality that cater to smoking patrons could experience declines, further amplifying the economic impact. Thus, rather than banning smoking, efforts should focus on balancing public health concerns with economic stability.
In conclusion, smoking should not be banned as it undermines personal freedoms and threatens economic stability. Governments should instead prioritize education and regulation to address health concerns without compromising individual autonomy or disrupting vital industries. By respecting choice and balancing interests, societies can achieve equitable outcomes for all.
Achieve your dream score with our detailed IELTS eBooks - your complete guide!