Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
Debate persists whether government funding should primarily support the arts and culture or sciences. Advocates for the arts emphasize its role in cultural identity and economic stimulation, whereas proponents of science funding highlight its critical impact on technological and medical progress. This essay will explore the significance of both areas, advocating for a balanced approach to governmental support to harness the comprehensive benefits of each.
Proponents of funding arts and culture argue that these fields are essential for fostering a society’s identity and emotional well-being. Artistic endeavours not only enrich personal experiences but also boost tourism and the economy. For instance, cultural festivals and art exhibitions attract visitors from around the globe, generating significant revenue and creating numerous jobs. These events also promote local craftsmanship and cultural heritage, further solidifying the arts' economic impact. Furthermore, art encourages critical thinking and creativity, skills that are crucial in any progressive society. For example, the rejuvenation of the South Bank in London, driven by cultural investments like the Tate Modern and the National Theatre, has demonstrated that art can be a catalyst for urban regeneration and economic growth, significantly improving local business environments and quality of life.
On the other hand, supporters of prioritizing science argue that technological and medical advancements depend heavily on sustained funding. The rapid development of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic underscores the critical role of science in addressing global challenges. Such scientific breakthroughs not only save lives but also stabilize economies by preventing disease outbreaks that can cripple societies. Investing in science leads to improvements in healthcare, infrastructure, and technology, directly enhancing the quality of life and security of a nation. Moreover, the economic benefits derived from scientific research often surpass initial investments, as seen in the technology sectors of Silicon Valley, which originated from government-funded basic research. These sectors not only create high-paying jobs but also drive innovation that feeds other industries, demonstrating a multiplier effect in economic terms.
In conclusion, while both arts and culture, and sciences serve pivotal roles in the development of a society, a balanced approach to government funding is essential. Supporting both sectors not only ensures a well-rounded societal development but also promotes a sustainable economic model that leverages the unique benefits of each area.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
There is ongoing debate about whether public funds should be allocated to arts and culture or reserved for scientific endeavours. This essay will explore the merits of both perspectives: the cultural enrichment and economic stimulation provided by funding the arts, against the tangible societal benefits derived from scientific research. I will argue that a balanced investment in both fields is essential for comprehensive societal development.
Supporters of funding art and culture argue that these domains are vital for preserving a society's heritage and fostering creativity among its populace. Government investment in the arts enhances access to culture across all socioeconomic groups, thus promoting social equality and inclusivity. For instance, public museums and libraries provide free access to cultural treasures and scholarly knowledge, which would otherwise be inaccessible to economically disadvantaged individuals. Additionally, funding cultural projects can stimulate local economies by attracting tourism and promoting local crafts. This is evident in cities like Florence and Kyoto, where cultural tourism not only preserves unique heritage but also significantly boosts the local economy through increased spending and job creation.
Conversely, proponents of prioritizing science argue that technological and medical advancements yield tangible benefits that address critical societal challenges, such as disease, environmental degradation, and technological underdevelopment. Government funding in scientific research has been instrumental in achievements like vaccines and renewable energy technologies, both of which have a profound impact on global health and sustainability. For example, the rapid development and dissemination of COVID-19 vaccines was largely enabled by substantial government funding and collaboration. These advocates maintain that the pragmatic value of scientific endeavours makes them a more crucial funding target, particularly in times of economic or health crises, as they provide solutions that can quickly ameliorate wide-scale problems and improve quality of life globally.
While both the arts and sciences play vital roles in societal development, it is clear that a balance between both fields is essential. Public funding should not exclusively prioritize one over the other but rather support both to harness their collective benefits. This balanced approach not only fosters a culturally rich society but also one that is scientifically progressive and equipped to tackle future challenges.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Commenti