You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.
You should write at least 250 words.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Answer 1
The perennial debate on whether nations should predominantly invest in vocational training over tertiary education ignites varied perspectives. This essay contends that while practical skills are imperative, the merits of university education cannot be undermined.
Primarily, proponents advocating to spend more money on skills and vocational training underscore the immediate applicability of such skills in the workforce. Practical work tends to offer swift economic benefits, as it equips individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.
Contrastingly, those who support the motion to spend money on university education argue that higher education cultivates a more profound skill set, including critical thinking, analytical abilities, and versatility, which are indispensable in the dynamic global market. Universities act as incubators for professionals like engineers, doctors, and educators, whose roles cannot be understated. These institutions not only provide theoretical knowledge but also encourage research and development. A quintessential example would be the role university research plays in medical breakthroughs, which are fundamental to societal progression.
However, juxtaposing these two educational pathways presents a false dichotomy. It is crucial to acknowledge that both vocational training and university education serve distinct yet complementary purposes. Investing in both areas can yield a more holistic and robust workforce. A balanced approach would not only harness immediate skill sets but also foster long-term intellectual capital which could adapt to future changes in the job market.
In conclusion, a balanced allocation of funds towards both vocational training and university education is imperative. The former addresses immediate economic demands with practical skills, while the latter ensures long-term societal progress through intellectual development. This dual investment strategy is crucial for a nation's comprehensive growth.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Answer 2
There is a claim that funding should be decreased for higher education and increased for the purpose of conducting workshops and trainings focused on obtaining jobs. This essay firmly concurs with this assertion since vocational training equips students with greater employability that enables them to land their desired employment without devoting years for obtaining a university degree.
To commence, vocational training facilities have given students hands-on opportunity to plan their professional paths. This practical sector has more overt goals of directing the students toward tangible job paths, in contrast to university education, which places a greater emphasis only on theoretical learning. Vocational programs provide internship opportunities as a component of the curriculum, which provide students some relevant powerful skills that are crucial for their later entry into the labour market. Furthermore, because job-related training institutions are rapidly receiving accreditation from governments and concerned upper echelons, degrees from this education platform not only satisfy the standards for formal qualifications, but also serve as credentials for practical abilities.
Additionally, vocational training fields have higher cost-effective values in terms of both time and money. While employment-oriented trainings are far less expensive and more accessible, university education is so expensive that some students are unable to pay it and end up taking out loans. Moreover, students in vocational schools typically spend only two years for a degree, which is sufficient time for acquiring their necessary skills, and they find their suitable jobs immediately after the degree, whereas university degrees typically take four years to complete and even after that the graduates struggle to find their desired jobs, resulting in a continuous debt burden. It follows that those who receive vocational training don't need to pursue additional years of education or wait an extended period of time to secure employment.
In conclusion, people with vocational education join the workforce more quickly than university graduates do, with more precise skill sets and less expenditure. Therefore, the onus is on governments to allocate more fund for this efficient skill-based education sector.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Answer 3
The allocation of a country's resources towards the betterment of its citizens' education has always been a topic of debate. Specifically, some argue that nations should channel more money on skills and vocational training geared towards practical work, as opposed to traditional university education. I vehemently agree with this stance, believing that the emphasis on vocational training offers more tangible benefits in the current global scenario.
One of the primary reasons for my perspective is the evident skills gap in many industries. While university degrees often provide a broad education, they sometimes lack the specialized training required for certain job roles. By investing more money in skills and vocational training, nations can directly address the needs of industries such as plumbing, carpentry, or even advanced roles in technology and healthcare. For instance, in countries like Germany, apprenticeship programs that focus on specific trades have led to lower youth unemployment rates, as young adults are equipped with the exact skills employers are seeking.
Moreover, the nature of work and employment is rapidly evolving with the advent of technology and automation. Practical skills that are honed through vocational training make individuals more adaptable and resilient in the face of such changes. A graduate with a degree in liberal arts might possess critical thinking and analytical skills, but may find it challenging to secure a job without the necessary practical skills that many industries now demand. Conversely, an individual trained in, say, digital marketing or coding through a vocational course, would find it considerably easier to enter the job market and even command a higher starting salary.
In conclusion, while university education remains valuable, it's vital for nations to prioritize skills and vocational training in today's dynamic job market. This shift not only assures economic stability but also paves the way for a prosperous future for their citizens.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score