You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below show the Medical research funding amount in millions of Dollars in Someland and also shows the death number for this area.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graphs below.
Write at least 150 words.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Model Answer 1
The bar charts provide a visual comparison of funding allocated for medical research against the mortality rates for various diseases in Someland. Significantly, there appears to be a discrepancy between the financial investment in disease research and the resultant death tolls from these ailments.
A noteworthy observation from the data is the substantial financial backing funneled into AIDS research, which receives the lion's share of the budget at approximately 175 million dollars. In contrast, the death rate from AIDS stands at a quarter of a million, suggesting a potentially effective deployment of these funds. Conversely, Tuberculosis (TB), with the least financial allotment for research—merely 25 million dollars—shows a disproportionate mortality figure, claiming 1.75 million lives, the highest among the listed diseases.
The funding for research on Leprosy and Tropical Diseases is identical, each at around 70 million dollars, yet the death toll from Tropical Diseases is notably higher. This trend of funding not directly correlating with death rates continues with Diarrhoea and Malaria. Both diseases received moderate research funds of 60 and 50 million dollars respectively and resulted in death tolls of half a million for Diarrhoea and 0.35 million for Malaria.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Model Answer 2
The presented bar graphs juxtapose the monetary input dedicated to medical research against the mortality statistics attributed to a sextet of diseases within the confines of Someland.
The overarching trend indicated by the charts showcases a general, though not universal, positive correlation between the magnitude of medical research funding and the death rates from the respective illnesses. Specifically, the investment in research for AIDS and TB is inversely proportional to their resultant mortalities.
Delving into specifics, AIDS research commands a staggering 175 million dollars, the zenith of funding, which correlates with a death toll of 0.25 million—substantial, yet surpassed by other diseases with less financial backing. TB, conversely, at the nadir of research funding with a modest 25 million dollars, bears the brunt of mortality rates, peaking at 1.75 million deaths. This stark contrast illuminates the potential efficacy of well-funded research initiatives.
Parallel funding paths for Leprosy and Tropical Diseases, each infused with approximately 70 million dollars, diverge at their impact, with Tropical Diseases claiming more lives. Similarly, Diarrhoea and Malaria, with allocations of 60 and 50 million dollars, respectively, reflect a mismatch between research investment and mortality rates, accounting for 0.5 and 0.35 million deaths in Someland.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Model Answer 3
The provided bar charts offer a comparison between the allocation of medical research funding and the number of deaths attributed to various diseases in Someland.
The overview of the data reveals a stark contrast between funding distribution and the mortality rates associated with each disease. Notably, while AIDS receives the most substantial research investment, tuberculosis (TB), despite having the highest death toll, is allocated the least funding.
In 1990, Someland's medical research funding prioritized AIDS with $180 million, followed by leprosy and tropical diseases, receiving $80 million and $79 million, respectively. Meanwhile, diarrhoea, malaria, and TB research were allocated significantly less, with $60 million, $50 million, and $20 million in that order. This funding distribution does not seem to correlate with the death figures from these diseases.
The death statistics from the same year paint a different picture. TB caused the most deaths at 1.8 million, malaria resulted in 0.4 million deaths, and diarrhoea accounted for 0.5 million. Contrastingly, AIDS, leprosy, and tropical diseases, which collectively received the highest research funding, were responsible for fewer deaths, with 0.2 million for AIDS, 0.1 million for leprosy, and 0.3 million for tropical diseases.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Model Answer 4
The bar graphs presented delineate the correlation between medical research funding in Someland, expressed in millions of dollars, and the incidence of fatalities caused by various diseases in 1990.
An initial inspection of the charts reveals a seemingly incongruent allocation of medical research funding relative to the mortality figures of the diseases. The most generously funded research area does not correspond to the disease with the highest death rate.
Delving into specifics, the funding for AIDS research topped the chart with a substantial investment of 180 million dollars, notwithstanding the recorded death toll being relatively moderate at 0.2 million. Leprosy and tropical diseases also received considerable funding, at 80 million and 79 million dollars respectively, despite having lower mortality rates of 0.1 million and 0.3 million. In stark contrast, diseases with higher death rates such as diarrhoea, malaria, and notably TB, which alone accounted for 1.8 million deaths, were allotted funds that paled in comparison: 60 million for diarrhoea, 50 million for malaria, and a surprisingly minimal 20 million for TB research.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score