Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
The escalating refugee crisis is one of the pressing global issues, with millions seeking safety and stability outside their homelands. Many argue that developed nations bear a moral responsibility to address this challenge by accepting more refugees. This essay contends that while developed countries should indeed assist, taking more refugees is not the sole solution. I will discuss the moral obligations of affluent nations and alternative strategies to address this issue sustainably.
One reason developed countries should welcome more refugees is the moral obligation to assist those fleeing conflict, persecution, or environmental disasters. The wealth and resources in these nations allow them to offer safety and opportunities to those displaced. For example, Canada and Germany have implemented successful refugee integration programs, enabling refugees to contribute positively to society. Accepting refugees not only provides them with a fresh start but can also benefit host nations through workforce diversification and cultural enrichment. However, it is crucial that such integration is approached thoughtfully. Without adequate support systems in education, housing, and employment, refugees risk marginalization and may struggle to thrive. This could lead to economic strain and societal tension, highlighting the importance of preparing robust infrastructure to support this influx.
Conversely, simply increasing refugee intake may not address the root causes driving mass displacement. Developed nations could more effectively address this issue by investing in stabilizing regions affected by conflict and poverty, thereby reducing the need for individuals to leave their homes. For instance, foreign aid directed toward economic development and peace-building initiatives has helped regions in Africa and the Middle East to gradually become more stable, enabling citizens to remain in their homeland. This approach is not only sustainable but also respectful of the refugees' preference to remain close to their cultural roots if security and livelihood are feasible. Thus, while accepting refugees can provide immediate relief, long-term solutions require collaborative global efforts to mitigate the conditions that force people to seek asylum.
In conclusion, although developed nations should play an active role in addressing the refugee crisis by accepting refugees, this should be part of a broader strategy. By combining refugee intake with targeted efforts to stabilize affected regions, the global community can create a more sustainable solution to this growing problem. Thus, developed countries have a dual responsibility: to offer immediate assistance and to foster long-term stability.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
The global refugee crisis is increasingly urgent, with developed nations being called upon to address it by accepting more refugees. I fully agree that affluent countries should increase their refugee intake, both to fulfill a humanitarian duty and to benefit from the economic and cultural contributions refugees can make. This essay will discuss the ethical imperatives and practical advantages of such an approach.
Developed nations have a profound ethical responsibility to assist individuals escaping conflict, persecution, and environmental disasters. With their economic strength and social infrastructure, these countries are in a unique position to offer refugees safety and stability. Countries like Sweden and Australia, for example, have effectively absorbed refugees into their societies, helping to restore dignity to those displaced. Beyond the moral obligation, embracing refugees enhances a nation's global standing by demonstrating commitment to universal human rights and compassion. It is essential to recognize that these individuals have endured severe hardships, and denying them asylum in stable nations would amplify their suffering. In an interconnected world, neglecting the plight of refugees is not just a regional issue; it reflects the values—or lack thereof—of the international community. Therefore, fulfilling this moral duty should be paramount for any nation with the resources to help.
Beyond ethical reasons, hosting refugees presents significant economic and cultural benefits to developed nations. By accepting refugees, countries can address labor shortages, particularly in aging populations where the workforce is declining. Refugees often bring skills, resilience, and a strong work ethic, which, with the right support, can bolster sectors like healthcare, agriculture, and technology. For instance, Syrian refugees in Germany have contributed substantially to the economy, with many opening businesses and filling essential job roles. Furthermore, refugees introduce diverse perspectives and cultural richness, enhancing the social fabric and fostering innovation. While initial integration requires investment, studies show that refugees often become net contributors to their host economies in the long term. Thus, helping refugees is not only a moral decision but also a strategic investment in a country’s future prosperity.
In conclusion, developed countries should indeed increase their acceptance of refugees, not only as a humanitarian obligation but also as a means to gain economically and socially. By combining moral responsibility with strategic foresight, these nations can achieve both ethical and practical benefits from welcoming refugees.
Sample Essay 3
With the surge in global refugee numbers, some advocate that developed nations should accept more refugees to alleviate this crisis. However, I firmly disagree with this view, as merely increasing refugee intake does not address the root causes and can strain social resources. This essay will argue that alternative solutions are more sustainable and beneficial for both refugees and host nations.
Increasing refugee intake in developed countries fails to address the root causes of forced displacement, which are often entrenched in political instability, economic mismanagement, and environmental issues. Instead of merely relocating those affected, developed nations could play a proactive role by investing in peace-building initiatives, supporting infrastructure development, and fostering economic growth within the refugees' home countries. For instance, international partnerships in war-torn regions like Syria have shown that stabilizing efforts—such as funding local governance structures and improving access to education—can reduce the need for migration in the first place. This approach is more humane, as it allows people to remain in their homeland, close to their cultural heritage, and helps stabilize regions at risk of humanitarian crises. Simply relocating refugees overlooks these underlying issues, perpetuating a cycle of dependency on wealthier nations rather than fostering self-reliance and sustainable growth in developing regions.
Additionally, admitting more refugees places significant social and economic strain on host countries, often causing societal tensions and resource allocation issues. Countries that accept large numbers of refugees may face pressure on healthcare, education, and housing systems, which can lead to reduced services for citizens and potentially inflame public resentment. For example, in parts of Europe, regions with high concentrations of refugees have encountered challenges with overcrowded schools and overstretched healthcare facilities, causing frustration among local residents. Furthermore, the rapid cultural shifts that accompany high refugee intake can lead to social polarization, as integration requires both time and resources. These challenges indicate that developed countries should prioritize providing targeted support, such as diplomatic aid and development funds, rather than increasing their own refugee populations, to better assist refugees while maintaining domestic stability.
In conclusion, accepting more refugees in developed nations is not an effective solution, as it fails to address underlying causes and creates social strain. Instead, developed countries should focus on stabilizing troubled regions, allowing individuals to thrive within their own countries and fostering a balanced approach to global humanitarian support.
Get your personalized IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score