Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
Celebrities today are routinely followed by photographers who capture their every action, satisfying the public’s growing curiosity. While some argue that this exposure benefits both celebrities and their fans by fostering engagement and career growth, others believe that it invades personal privacy, causing emotional stress and crossing ethical boundaries. In my view, although public interest in celebrities is understandable, the constant intrusion into their private lives is unjustifiable, and clear boundaries are essential to protect their well-being.
On one hand, many believe that photographing celebrities is justified because it caters to the public's growing demand for insight into the lives of the rich and famous. In an age dominated by social media and entertainment, people are eager to know more about their favourite actors, athletes, and public figures. Photographs taken in public spaces offer an authentic glimpse into these individuals' real lives, strengthening their bond with fans. Moreover, public figures often rely on media attention to maintain relevance and promote their careers. For instance, actors or musicians often benefit from media coverage of their lifestyle, as it builds curiosity about their upcoming projects. Thus, public interest and fame are interdependent, making photography an essential part of modern celebrity culture.
On the other hand, constant surveillance by photographers can be intrusive, violating a person’s right to privacy. Celebrities are human beings entitled to personal space, and relentless photographing—especially in intimate moments—can lead to stress and emotional harm. Not every public appearance is a performance; even famous people deserve quiet moments with their families or friends without the fear of being watched. A pertinent example is how several celebrities have publicly expressed frustration at being followed, especially when their children are involved. Additionally, such invasive practices raise ethical questions about sensationalism and boundaries, as photographers often prioritize profits over respect. When personal moments are exploited to attract clicks and sell tabloids, it reflects a toxic aspect of fame.
In conclusion, while photographing famous people satisfies public interest and helps maintain celebrity relevance, it can also become an intrusive practice that harms personal well-being. I believe there must be a balance between media coverage and respect for privacy. Setting ethical boundaries for photographers is essential to protect personal space without undermining the public's right to stay informed.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
In today’s media-driven world, photographers constantly follow celebrities to capture their everyday activities, often generating public fascination. Some argue that this practice invades the personal lives of famous individuals, causing emotional distress. However, others believe it serves a legitimate purpose by feeding public interest and keeping celebrities relevant. In my view, while privacy concerns are understandable, the advantages of media exposure for celebrities and their fans outweigh the drawbacks.
Those who criticize the constant presence of photographers argue that it undermines celebrities’ basic right to privacy. They contend that being followed everywhere—even in personal or family moments—creates undue stress and violates human dignity. Celebrities have publicly expressed frustration over the relentless attention, especially when their children or private events are involved. Furthermore, this culture encourages sensationalism, where trivial or misleading content is sold for profit, often leading to misinformation and public harassment. These critics emphasize that fame should not come at the cost of emotional well-being, and argue that the media should respect boundaries between public and private lives.
However, despite these concerns, photographing celebrities is not only inevitable but beneficial in today’s entertainment industry. Fame is built and sustained by public interest, and photographers play a crucial role in keeping celebrities relevant. Regular media exposure strengthens their personal brands, making them more appealing for endorsements, collaborations, and future projects. For example, fashion models and actors often rely on paparazzi photos to maintain visibility, ensuring they stay in the public’s consciousness between major releases. Additionally, fans develop a deeper connection when they see candid glimpses of their favorite celebrities’ real lives, fostering loyalty and engagement. In many cases, celebrities even manipulate media attention to their advantage, using publicity to promote their ventures. Therefore, this dynamic, though invasive, becomes a mutually beneficial arrangement.
In conclusion, while photographing celebrities raises valid privacy concerns, it serves an essential role in maintaining public engagement and sustaining careers in the entertainment world. Given the mutual benefits for celebrities and their fans, the continuous media presence around famous individuals is both necessary and justifiable.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 3
In the modern world, celebrities are frequently photographed in public by professional photographers, with these images often dominating media platforms. While some argue that such exposure is necessary to satisfy public interest and sustain fame, others believe it unfairly invades personal boundaries. In my opinion, the benefits of this exposure for both celebrities and the public outweigh the privacy concerns, as it plays a crucial role in the dynamics of fame and the entertainment industry.
Critics argue that constant media attention causes emotional stress and erodes the personal lives of celebrities. The pressure of being under constant observation means they rarely experience genuine privacy, even during mundane or intimate moments. This intrusion can lead to mental health challenges, as celebrities must carefully manage their behavior in public to avoid scandals or misinterpretations. For example, incidents of paparazzi harassing celebrities, such as the tragic pursuit that led to Princess Diana’s death, highlight the extreme consequences of relentless media intrusion. Furthermore, critics contend that fame should not strip individuals of their right to lead normal lives beyond the public eye, suggesting that legal frameworks should better protect celebrities from invasive photography.
On the other hand, public exposure through photography is an essential mechanism that sustains celebrity culture and helps individuals in the spotlight remain relevant. Without continuous media coverage, public figures risk fading from the public consciousness, which can directly affect their marketability and career prospects. For instance, social media influencers, musicians, and actors thrive on visibility to attract sponsorships and maintain their influence. Additionally, photographs of celebrities provide entertainment for the public, meeting the growing demand for insight into the lives of the famous. This mutually beneficial relationship not only entertains audiences but also enables celebrities to promote personal brands and philanthropic causes. As long as the photographs are taken in public spaces, where privacy is already limited, such exposure remains justifiable within ethical limits.
In conclusion, although photographing celebrities may at times infringe on their personal lives, the benefits it brings to their careers and the entertainment industry are significant. The constant media presence not only sustains public engagement but also enhances celebrities’ influence, making it a justifiable aspect of modern fame.
Get your personalized IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score