Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
Environmental challenges are often debated as issues best tackled either on a global scale or through national policies. While some argue that global cooperation is necessary for meaningful impact, this essay asserts that focusing on local, national efforts is more practical and impactful. The following discussion will explore the arguments for both perspectives, ultimately showing why national actions are the preferable approach to addressing environmental issues effectively.
Proponents of a global approach argue that issues like climate change, ocean pollution, and deforestation are interconnected and require collaborative international solutions. For example, countries contribute to global warming by emitting greenhouse gases, and the cumulative effect of these emissions impacts all regions, regardless of their individual emissions. Thus, international frameworks, such as the Kyoto Protocol or Paris Agreement, are designed to unite nations around shared climate goals. By setting universal standards, these agreements aim to hold countries accountable and reduce emissions collectively. Additionally, wealthier nations can assist developing ones by providing technological and financial resources, fostering a more equitable solution to climate issues. However, despite these intentions, global agreements are often hindered by non-compliance, varied economic interests, and insufficient enforcement mechanisms, raising doubts about their effectiveness. This view argues that without robust compliance, global agreements often lack the power to drive real, enforceable change.
In contrast, focusing on national efforts allows countries to address their unique environmental challenges more precisely and implement policies that directly benefit their local ecosystems and communities. Countries vary significantly in their environmental challenges—Brazil faces deforestation, China battles severe urban air pollution, and small island nations struggle with rising sea levels. Tailoring policies to these specific issues is not only more feasible but also likely to produce more measurable outcomes. For instance, Japan’s strict regulations on industrial waste have reduced pollution levels in its rivers and lakes, showing how localized policies can produce tangible improvements. National policies are more likely to be enforced rigorously, as local governments have the authority to impose penalties and ensure compliance within their borders. This localized approach encourages countries to take ownership of their environmental responsibilities and enables them to experiment with innovative, culturally relevant solutions that a global framework may overlook.
In conclusion, while international cooperation is valuable in addressing cross-border environmental issues, focusing on national strategies is often more practical and effective. National policies enable countries to create targeted, enforceable solutions that directly address their unique challenges, making local action a more impactful approach to solving environmental problems.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
Environmental issues are a critical concern worldwide, with some advocating for global solutions while others argue that national approaches are more effective. This essay contends that while addressing environmental problems on an international scale is crucial for tackling global issues like climate change, national measures play an equally significant role in managing localized challenges. The following discussion will explore the rationale for both perspectives and demonstrate why a dual approach is ultimately the most effective.
A global approach to environmental challenges is necessary to combat issues that transcend national borders, such as climate change, ocean pollution, and biodiversity loss. For example, greenhouse gas emissions from industrialized nations contribute to global warming, affecting ecosystems and populations worldwide. International agreements, like the Paris Agreement, encourage nations to collectively reduce carbon emissions, promoting a unified response to climate threats. By establishing common goals and sharing technological advancements, countries can make significant strides in minimizing the long-term impacts of climate change. Moreover, a global approach fosters accountability, as countries are more likely to uphold environmental commitments under international scrutiny.
On the other hand, national policies are vital for addressing specific environmental challenges unique to each country, such as deforestation in Brazil or air pollution in urban China. Local governments are often better equipped to assess the specific environmental needs of their regions and can implement policies tailored to their unique ecological landscapes. For instance, Norway’s commitment to preserving its forests and promoting electric vehicles has significantly reduced its carbon footprint, showcasing the effectiveness of national-level interventions. Additionally, national policies can create employment opportunities and drive economic growth through green industries, incentivizing countries to invest in sustainable practices. This localized approach ensures that environmental initiatives are practical and culturally relevant, increasing their likelihood of success.
In conclusion, while a global strategy is essential for addressing transnational environmental challenges, national measures allow countries to tackle issues specific to their regions effectively. A balanced approach, integrating both international collaboration and local policies, is the most comprehensive path toward a sustainable future, benefiting both the planet and individual nations.
Sample Essay 3
Environmental issues spark a debate over whether they should be tackled globally or within national borders. While addressing environmental concerns locally allows countries to focus on issues specific to their ecosystems, such as deforestation or pollution control, a global approach fosters cooperation on issues that transcend borders, like climate change and ocean pollution. This essay supports the view that only a coordinated, international effort can effectively combat the interconnected nature of modern ecological crises.
Those who advocate for a national approach believe that countries are best suited to tackle their own environmental problems independently. They argue that each country has unique ecological needs, resources, and priorities, which can be addressed more precisely through localized policies. For instance, policies tailored to curb industrial pollution might be highly effective in developed nations, whereas reforestation initiatives may be more urgent in countries experiencing rapid deforestation, such as Brazil. Supporters of this view also contend that national sovereignty can be compromised when countries are forced to adhere to global environmental agreements, which may conflict with their economic interests. Moreover, without a one-size-fits-all solution, national approaches provide the flexibility needed to design policies that are culturally and politically viable. However, while this approach allows for tailored policies, it fails to recognize that many environmental issues, such as greenhouse gas emissions, have impacts that extend far beyond national borders, rendering isolated efforts inadequate in the face of global environmental crises.
In contrast, a global approach to environmental issues acknowledges the transboundary nature of today’s ecological challenges and promotes unified action. Climate change, oceanic plastic pollution, and biodiversity loss are examples of problems that cannot be contained within a single nation’s borders and thus require cooperative efforts. For instance, the Paris Agreement unites countries worldwide in a shared goal to reduce carbon emissions, fostering a sense of accountability among nations and enabling the pooling of resources and technological expertise. This collaborative model has led to the development of renewable energy technologies and environmental protections that are more accessible to developing nations. Additionally, global initiatives create a framework within which countries can set ambitious, shared targets, pushing each other towards greater environmental responsibility. While implementation varies, global agreements provide the necessary oversight and international pressure to foster more consistent and far-reaching environmental action, thereby maximizing the potential for long-term global sustainability.
In conclusion, although national initiatives are effective for addressing localized issues, a global approach is essential for tackling interconnected, cross-border environmental challenges. By fostering cooperation, shared accountability, and resource sharing, a global strategy offers a more comprehensive solution to today’s complex ecological crises.
Get your personalized IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score