You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is positive development, while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.
You should write at least 250 words.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 1
A Group of people believe that there are many underlying benefits involved to the fast-growing international businesses and cultural expansion, whereas others argue that this trend could have negative effects on their traditional values. Though there is a concern of losing the native identity, in my opinion, people’s interaction with different cultures and nations rather comes up with mutual benefits.
To begin with, there is an associated fear of losing cultural identity when it comes to excessive engagement with different nationals in terms of business, language and other activities. In other words, interaction among people from various backgrounds involves lingual, cultural and religious variations as well. This multi-national communication forces locals to learn and get adjusted with the imported culture and norms, which can eventually lead them to become completely oblivious to their native identity. For instance, western individualism has been spread over the world via American tourists and businesses. Many teenagers indulge themselves in these foreign cultures and eventually have started following these imported values as their own.
On the other hand, these days people tend to travel abroad for work or study as well as travelling as a tourist. Therefore, natives are exposed to the different cultures of other nations which broaden their horizon. Also, welfare and businesses are not limited to home countries anymore, as most of the large companies or brands have branches all around the world. As a result, more employments are being generated for the locals. In addition, international contacts in terms of businesses and cultural exchanges allow individuals to explore other countries, experience diverse environments, inject foreign currencies to the destination countries to bear the travel expenses which eventually have a knock-on-effect on the involved countries’ mutual development.
In conclusion, native cultures might be distorted when it is exposed to foreign ones due to people’s engagement from different nations, but it is insignificant compared to the mutual benefits that the involved nations could avail.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 2
In the modern era, the phenomenon of increasing business and cultural contact between countries has ignited a debate regarding its implications. On one hand, it is heralded as a harbinger of positive development, fostering global unity and economic prosperity. On the other, it is feared for potentially diluting national identities. This essay endeavours to explore both perspectives, ultimately positing that the benefits of such global interconnectedness far outweigh its drawbacks.
Advocates of the increasing business and cultural contact argue that it paves the way for a more interconnected and harmonious world. Economically, it enables countries to leverage their comparative advantages, leading to enhanced efficiency and innovation. For instance, the global IT industry thrives on the cross-border collaboration of talents, resulting in groundbreaking technological advancements. Culturally, this contact promotes mutual understanding and tolerance among diverse populations. The proliferation of international festivals and exchange programs are quintessential examples, where people learn to appreciate the rich tapestry of global cultures, thereby fostering a sense of global community.
Conversely, skeptics warn against the erosion of national identities, fearing that the ubiquitous spread of dominant cultures could overshadow local traditions and languages. They argue that as countries increasingly adopt similar business practices and cultural expressions, unique national characteristics may fade into obscurity. This perspective is encapsulated in the concern over the dominance of English as a global lingua franca, potentially marginalizing indigenous languages and, by extension, cultures.
However, upon scrutiny, it becomes evident that the integration brought about by increasing business and cultural contact does not necessarily entail the loss of national identities. Rather, it presents an opportunity for nations to showcase their unique cultures on a global stage, while simultaneously embracing the benefits of a connected world. The key lies in striking a balance between openness to global influences and the preservation of cultural heritage.
In conclusion, while the apprehension regarding the loss of national identities is understandable, the overarching benefits of increased business and cultural contact between countries - economic growth, innovation, and enhanced global harmony - significantly outweigh these concerns. Embracing this global interconnectedness, while conscientiously safeguarding national heritage, can lead to a richer, more diverse world, beneficial for all.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Essay 3
Since multilateral relations serve many countries to come together for several purposes, the attitude to this type of interaction varies among people. Some people are highly satisfied with positive implications of multicultural development while others stubbornly support national identities. Though there is a concern of losing the native identity, in my opinion, people’s interaction from different cultures and nations rather comes up with mutual benefits. I am going to elucidate both views and my humble opinion with relevant arguments.
Unlike isolated countries, multicultural countries benefit from their partners with different business ethics, investment opportunities and open trade. Consequently, people are also affected by business relations such as importing and exporting goods and working in joint stock companies in order to improve their well-being. In a dynamic environment, people learn more about each other’s culture and become more tolerant and behave more consciously in a community. For example, United Arab Emirates was bombarded by a hail of direct foreign investments and know-how in the late of 20th century and as a result, it has turned into one of the business and cultural centres of the world. As a result, both local and foreign inhabitants take advantage of working and living in a diverse atmosphere.
However, patriotic people oppose multiculturalism supposing that national sovereignty will gradually disappear leaving its place to other cultures. These people are too worried about the young generation who doesn’t fully perceive some fundamentals of the culture. Because budding generation is prone to change long-rooted customs with more innovative and novice tendency since they see no sensible meaning. In fact, most of underdeveloped countries applause this approach and multiculturalism is the slow process in these societies.
To conclude, both group of people are right for themselves depending on their choice to be conservative or innovative. I firmly believe that integrating into the world with culture might have an optimum solution to conservative countries. Because globalization is inevitable, and countries need to contact each other in order to meet their demands better.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score