You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the average cost of housing in three different areas.
Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown in the diagrams below.
Write at least 150 words.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Answer 1
The bar graph provides a comparison of the average cost of housing in three different areas—rural, suburban, and urban—during the years 1990 and 2000.
Overall, housing prices rose substantially across all areas over the given period, with urban housing remaining the most expensive. The cost in suburban areas also saw a significant surge, while rural areas experienced the lowest housing prices throughout both years.
In 1990, the average cost of housing in rural areas stood at approximately $75,000, making it the most affordable among the three categories. Housing in suburban areas was slightly more expensive, costing around $100,000. Meanwhile, urban housing was by far the most costly, with an average price of $150,000, double the amount in rural areas.
By 2000, the trend of rising housing prices continued across all areas. Urban housing costs skyrocketed to $300,000, precisely twice the figure recorded in 1990. The suburban housing market also experienced a sharp increase, reaching $275,000, which was nearly three times the cost of 1990. Rural housing prices, though increasing to $125,000, remained the most affordable among the three categories, lagging significantly behind the suburban and urban sectors.
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Sample Answer 2
The bar chart illustrates the average cost of housing in three different areas—rural, suburban, and urban—over two years, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, housing prices increased significantly across all three areas during the decade, with urban housing consistently being the most expensive. Suburban areas experienced a notable surge in prices, while rural housing remained the most affordable despite a rise in cost over time.
In 1990, the average price of housing in rural areas stood at around $75,000, the lowest among the three. In suburban areas, housing costs were moderately higher, at approximately $100,000, while urban housing was the most expensive, with prices reaching $150,000. These figures reflect a clear price disparity, with urban housing costing twice as much as rural homes.
By 2000, housing prices had risen sharply across the board. Urban housing costs doubled to $300,000, maintaining the highest position among the three categories. Suburban housing also experienced a dramatic rise, reaching $275,000, which was nearly three times the 1990 figure. Although rural housing prices increased to $125,000 over the decade, they remained far more affordable than both suburban and urban housing, offering the most economical option among the three regions.
Sample Answer 3
The bar graph illustrates the average cost of housing in three different areas—rural, suburban, and urban—across two distinct years, 1990 and 2000, offering insight into how housing prices changed over time.
Overall, the cost of housing increased considerably across all three areas over the decade. Urban areas consistently maintained the highest housing prices, while rural areas offered the most affordable housing options in both years. Suburban housing prices also rose significantly but stayed between the other two categories.
In 1990, the average cost of housing in three different areas showed a clear pattern. Rural housing was the least expensive, with prices remaining under $100,000. Suburban housing was moderately higher, priced closer to $100,000, while urban housing was the most expensive, costing around $150,000, which was noticeably higher than both rural and suburban housing.
A decade later, by 2000, housing prices had risen steeply across all areas. In urban regions, the cost of housing doubled, reaching $300,000, the highest across the three sectors. Suburban areas saw a dramatic rise as well, with housing prices climbing to $275,000, nearly triple the amount from 1990. Although rural housing experienced an increase to $125,000, it remained far more affordable compared to suburban and urban prices, continuing to offer the lowest housing costs among the three.
Sample Answer 4
The bar chart compares the average cost of housing in three different areas—rural, suburban, and urban—over the years 1990 and 2000, showing how property prices evolved during this period.
Overall, housing prices rose significantly in all areas, with urban housing remaining the most expensive. Suburban housing followed closely behind, experiencing a substantial price increase, while rural housing, though also becoming more costly, remained the most affordable option throughout both years.
In 1990, the average cost of housing in three different areas revealed a noticeable gap between urban and rural regions. Rural properties were the cheapest, with prices remaining below $100,000. Suburban homes were priced higher, nearing the $100,000 mark, while urban housing was significantly more expensive, reaching approximately $150,000, highlighting a clear difference across the three categories.
By 2000, property prices had climbed steeply across the board. The cost of urban housing doubled to $300,000, maintaining its status as the most expensive. Suburban housing saw an equally impressive surge, rising to $275,000, nearly tripling over the decade. Meanwhile, rural areas, though more affordable, experienced a noticeable increase as well, with prices reaching $125,000, keeping them the most budget-friendly option among the three sectors.
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks, get everything you need to achieve a high band score